September 11, 2017 on 9/11; additions/editing 09/18/2017 added 09/18/2017: See also book: Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America (2009) By P. David Gaubatz, Paul E. Sperry; published by WND (World Net Daily) 09/11/2017: Racketeering (definition):  Originally, and often still specifically, a racket was a criminal act in which the perpetrator or perpetrators offer a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a non-existent problem, or a service that will not be put into effect, or that would not otherwise exist if the racket did not exist. Conducting a racket is racketeering.[1] Particularly, the potential problem may be caused by the same party that offers to solve it, although that fact may be concealed, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage for this party. The most common example of a racket is the "protection racket." The racket itself promises to protect the target business or person from dangerous individuals in the neighborhood; then either collects their money or causes the damages to the business until the owner pays. The racket exists as both the problem and its solution and is used as a method of extortion.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(crime) On Bush, Jr - John Kiriakou: http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=13789 Excerpt:  What happened then was the president ordered the FBI out, the CIA in, and the CIA began torturing him using several different methods and culminating in waterboarding.  JAY: How do you know it was the president that ordered it? KIRIAKOU: Well, that's what came out over the course of the investigation later on, that these tactics had all been approved by the president and that the White House was unhappy with the pace of the interrogations. They wanted information more quickly.  See, bin Laden said right after September 11 that he was planning another attack that would dwarf what happened on September 11. So, many CIA officers were convinced that Abu Zubaydah had that information, and they were determined to get it out of him. That's why they got rough so quickly.  http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=13789 Newer Black Panthers:  My suggestion is for people to investigate and stay focused on them.  There might be a tendency to forget them, but I feel they are more central to several issues than is realized.  I suspect cartels on reservations are connected to it.  People involved seem to include both Red Power (Native American) and Latino movements.  Sometimes the voices seem to come from the Jewish sector; we can ask if they are Jews or impersonations.  For example, some blacks are insisting they were the original Jews or Hebrews needing to come back to Israel.  Some of the behavior is so out there mainstream Americans seem to have trouble pinpointing what is going on.  This goes along with The Arabian Nights Effect section on this website, which is less about Arabs and more about a general underworld.  This latent world mixes theatrics, dreams, visions, imagination, psychic energy and sorcery to manifest certain effects. It includes the power of thought or will to create alternative realities.  For Americans who have been taught from birth either the rational anti-metaphysical or the Christian dualistic Heaven/Hell approach, things get lost in the cracks. Neither approach gets to the meat of the matter.  In my opinion, that is one reason 9/11 happened.  People were looking elsewhere or elsehow.   In other words, the whacky world involved in orchestrating 9/11 requires a certain type of perceptual lens.  People need to bend and align using a danceful creativity to get in sync.  American pragmatism had blind spots preventing true vision and effective responses.  There is evidence Americans did know the Saudi terrorists were in the country engaged in highly suspicious activities.  FBI agents had  enough information to go on.  Instead, things were thwarted.  Evidence was not acted on and was suppressed.  To overcome these  obstacles, another kind of response was needed, another kind of approach.  Some people suggest the non-response was deliberate,  that suppression was top down, coming from the President’s office. Bosnian connection to 9/11: I maintain there was yet an additional layer pulling the strings. I  think it is likely linked to the Bosnian and Afghan/Soviet wars. See: The American Conservative:  The Bosnian Connection.  By Brendan O’Neill (07/16/2007) http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-bosnian-connection/ Excerpt: The Bosnia experience had a transformative effect on both. It made some on the Left pro-interventionist, and it turned  some Mujahideen from religious nationalists, as they had been in Afghanistan, into self-described cross-border warriors  against evil. It is striking how many al-Qaeda attacks were facilitated or carried out by veterans of the Bosnian jihad. Khalid  Sheikh Mohammad, architect of the 9/11 attacks, fought in Bosnia, as did two of the hijackers. One of the main suspects in the  Madrid train bombings trained in Bosnia. (He, too, was inspired to go there by Western media coverage.) The foiled  “millennium plot” to blow up the Los Angeles airport in 2000 was overseen by individuals with connections to Bosnia, as were  the 1998 African embassy bombings. http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-bosnian-connection/  But no matter who was ultimately responsible, the fact is we had enough information to stop 9/11, but since we did not, something  was off.  Part of the reason is likely the overall mindset of the country itself in dealing with perceived abnormalities.  Aramco - US oil and gas and US military connection We can ask if a  military-Aramco link was calling the shots: FBI Cover-Ups:  See: The Real News:  Sen. Bob Graham: FBI Covered Up Role of Bandar and Saudis in 9/11 Attacks (Pt.1/2) video (09/11/2016) http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=17227  Senator Bob Graham, former Co-Chair of the Joint Congressional Committee investigating 9/11, says there is evidence in the  "28 redacted pages" that the FBI knew of Saudi Ambassador Bandar's links to Al Qaida terrorists before the attacks http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=17227 Saudi Aramco-US  Connections See: Bloomberg:  Oil to jihad and 9/11 the highs and lows of US-Saudi ties. By Glen Carey (05/18/2017) Moderate coverage of Saudi implications in 9/11 - brief historical review of US-Saudi-Middle East connections https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-18/oil-to-jihad-and-9-11-the-highs-and-lows-of-u-s- saudi-ties  Excerpt:  The U.S. and the Al Saud monarchy have been strategic partners since King Abdul-Aziz Al Saud, the founder of modern  Saudi Arabia, met President Franklin D. Roosevelt aboard the USS Quincy in early 1945. At that meeting in the Suez Canal, the  men discussed two issues that have determined much of the region’s post-World War II history -- the creation of a Jewish  homeland in Palestine, and a Saudi-U.S. pact based on American security guarantees for the kingdom in return for U.S. access  to Saudi oil….Saudi Arabia signed its first oil concession deal with Standard Oil Co. of California in 1933. Five years later  commercial quantities of oil were discovered in the eastern region of Dammam. The Arabian American Oil Co. was formed in  1944 and based in New York until 1952. The Saudi government gradually increased its stake in the firm, known as Aramco, and  by 1980 owned it outright…The U.S. based troops in Saudi Arabia for its 1991 war to force Iraq’s army from Kuwait. Some  conservative religious figures in a nation that’s home to Islam’s holiest shrines condemned their presence. U.S. troops left  Saudi Arabia in 2003 after Saddam Hussein was toppled, helping to curb criticism of Saudi rulers. Counter-terrorism  cooperation was improved and Saudi Arabia is the top purchaser of U.S. weapons, according to the Stockholm International  Peace Research Institute….Fifteen of the 19 hijackers involved in the attacks, which killed about 3,000 people, were Saudi  nationals. Suspicion between the two nations rose as Americans questioned their special relationship. Bin Laden, who headed  the al-Qaeda terrorist group before being killed by U.S. special forces in Pakistan, had called for the overthrow of the Saudi  royal family and the removal of U.S. troops from the kingdom….Saudi leaders opposed George W. Bush’s decision to remove  Saddam Hussein in 2003 and did not join the coalition, arguing the invasion would split Iraq along sectarian lines. The war and  its aftermath unleashed conflict between Iraq’s majority Shiites and Sunnis, which years later contributed to the creation of  the jihadist movement now known as Islamic State. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-18/oil-to-jihad-and-9-11-the-highs-and-lows-of-u-s-saudi-ties  The Times:  Activist says listing for Saudi Aramco would be bankrolling terror.  By Dominic Walsh (08/30/2017) https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/activist-says-listing-for-saudi-aramco-would-be-bankrolling-terror-h3sqg9hw2 Excerpt  Kristen Breitweiser, whose husband Ron was among the victims of the attacks on the Twin Towers, claimed that  hosting the listing would reward a country widely alleged to have provided financial and logistical support for the attacks. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/activist-says-listing-for-saudi-aramco-would-be-bankrolling-terror-h3sqg9hw2  Ex-Florida Senator Graham suggests either the Bush administration was complicit in 9/11 or, because of a long-term friendship with  certain members of the Saudi royalty, didn’t want to know: See: The Real News:  Sen. Bob Graham: Bush/Cheney Created Intel Culture "Not Wanting to Know" about 9/11 Attacks (Pt.2/2)(09/11/2016) Senator Bob Graham, forme r Co-Chair of the Joint Congressional Committee investigating 9/11, says President Bush was like a  "head coach" ordering intelligence agencies to all move in the same direction - not preventing the attacks and covering up the  role of Bandar and the Saudi government http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=17228  A Problem of Vision: Why US failed to thwart 9/11 Part of that approach could have been monkey see, monkey do.  That is, respond to the monkeys like monkeys.  Keep up with the  antics with a new and flexible approach.  Respond accordingly.  Match the behavior with an equal level of sneakiness and stealth.   Operate within their mental framework.   Things Bush Wasn’t Telling Us I think part of the problem was we were trying to pretend our president was a nice person, that he was on our side. The overall hum  and buzz of the media kept up the illusion of business as usual.  Mesmerized into complacency, oddities and warning bells were  brushed under the carpet or melted into the woodwork.   Bush, Jr. was reponsible, but stay focused on the real culprits Bush, Jr. was probably pushing the envelope to see how far he could get away with it. Along with being the abused individual I think  he is, he was lying through his teeth.   His voice, intonation, body language, actions and non-actions all pointed to the rabbit hiding  something in the hat.  Some people seethingly insist he was a central figure in 9/11, along with Cheney.  Others say he was too stupid.   There are times I too dismiss his mental acuity, but I suspect he probably is as capable as the average citizen.  It is very likely his father had more to do with the trends and ideas which finally ended up in 9/11; in my opinion, his father was more the grounded  weasel capable of starting and supporting an enterprise like this than his son.  Someone stronger than Bushes behind 9/11; some people say it was bin Laden; others suggest secret agencies (CIA, Mossad) There is a trail of apparent evidence linking bin Laden, Pakistan, Afghanistan, the Saudis to 9/11.  Bush is known to have told the CIA to use torture to get info out of caught alleged terrorists.  The push for info by torturing these people does suggest it was not an inside job from the Bush direction. See: A Tortured Truth Reality Asserts Itself (8/10)  Former CIA official John Kiriakou described his time as head of counter terrorism in Pakistan and the lie about the torture of Abu Zubaydah  (05/04/2015) http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=13789 However, I still think there were yet stronger power figures than the Bushes behind the scenes pushing the actual buttons.  Some people suggest Jewish bankers; others suggest Islamic  bankers and the Saudi princedom.   Bush, Jr.’s weaknesses My intuition tells me at least a couple of additional issues were at hand.  Disenfranchised from mainstream normalcy and more  astute politicians and responsible leaders, he felt most people didn’t really vote for him nor want him in office.  His role was more of  the outcast who figures it is basically over for him in any authentic way. That is, he figured several key people knew what and who he  really was.  In that state of feeling like a rejected outsider, he did not know how to ask for help.  He was at once playing along because  of his vilified state, but also as a victim of the key orchestrators - possibly a victim since childhood.   Secondly, I have sensed for some time now that part of Bush, Jr’s  immaturity stems from a sense of real or imagined sexual  inadequacy - manhood or potency issues.  Not a grounded independent soul, a sense of inadequacy kept him from stepping back  from the plans being made or to ask for help.  You see, political figures might feel so disenfranchised and isolated from the normal  mainstream public they don’t how to reach out for help.  So Bush kept up his antics, added his own two bits and played along.   Pushing the envelope included pressure from the actual power movers behind the scene.  They pushed him, he pushed the envelope,  tested the waters, challenged things to the nth degree.  Feeling he was already in the sewer, there was no other place to go but down. We still need to look past Bush and find the people who were pulling the strings.  In addition to the Saudis, I feel the players included  the American military (like the Naval arena) with key petro holders in the Middle East.  General Electric is right in the middle of it, as  well as Aramco.  Engineers and other technical types need to be held accountable, as well. Arms and aircraft manufacturers were  a  major part of it.  The list goes on.   The United States was drained of resources and sustainable growth, maintenance and repair  support as money went to the wrong people.   Jobs kept going to third world countries or power players like China.  The question is,  how do we take the reigns from these people so we can get our country back? Other resulting problems in the country include how sixteen years later certain groups have responded.  We are seeing hard-line  patriarchal evangelists and secular male oriented types who are doing two things, as if putting more macho into it will quell the fire.   First, the evangelists have not been trained or educated to respond effectively to what we are dealing with.  Their responses are  short-sighted, antagonistic and dull.  Things are too complex and multidimensional for their overly simplistic and often ignorant  responses.  The evangelists are often stubborn and backwards.  We cannot count on them to keep us out of wars or to help society as  a whole, either.  They are also potentially manipulated by invisible fingers - especially the exploitative antics of groups using cyborg  technology.  I suspect several of the political evangelists are being influenced and twisted by minority groups using psychotronic  game playing.  The secular male oriented types are driven largely by economics and personal agendas with no real commitment to  anyone other than themselves.  There are some “types” to consider, but it is the general approach, not their job descriptions, we need  to consider.  These types include those supporting a military-police state with a tendency to focus on guns and weapons; they  calculate making more money from certain occupations like oil and gas rather than focus on solar or more sustainable economies.  They try to stay away from lower pay occupations and try to economize their time and energy spent against how much money they  are pulling in.  They look for loopholes and ways to invest in rentals or other low energy output/high return enterprises.  They try to  stay away from people who are poor or seem like losers.  They tend to categorize women as a whole and especially certain kinds of  women.  They are not worried about planetary health and safety.  They are lone wolves or male groupies.  Rather than putting down  roots and making a commitment to bettering the areas the live in, they easily move to new areas where the opportunities are better.   hey are often pragmatic, intelligent and capable, but lack visionary power.  They won’t help society as a whole.  The educated and experienced Midway We need intelligent, resourceful and middle-of-the-ground types taking over the country immediately - a good mix of racially mixed  moderates who are white, non-white and mixes thereof.  The angry, rebellious and quacky alternative left types would want to put  Obama back in or another black racist - moderate and multi-dimensional whites (not just white evangelists or white far left liberals)  must be represented in the next leadership group.  A good mix does in fact include whites, but is not limited to whites or any other  race, religion, culture or creed.   Take back the media We need to take back our media and stop the fake news, which is largely controlled by certain groups.  We need facts in our news to  know what is going on so we can make good decisions for ourselves and our country.  I have seen religious conservatives insist real  news includes only their religious perspectives, so they call the liberal media fake news.  From the rest of our perspectives, religious  news is potentially fake news, or at least impossibly slanted.   Biased news needs to go into opinion forums and remain in sectarian  platforms; news needs to be factual and open to providing various views and interpretations of the data.  If the media is purposely  concealing a non-earthquake/tsunami reason behind Fukushima, the entire globe has a right to know about it.   Fake news is a  supreme form of tyranny in these matters, exploiting people’s ignorance or inability to get at the facts for themselves because of lack  of knowledge of advanced technology, security blocks or geographic distance.  Fake news is abuse. A definition of real news takes us beyond opinions and beliefs into the realm of verifiable facts, but it is more than that.  For example,  we might be able to verify that a Hurricane Irma, but investigative and revelatory reporting would cover the real reasons there is an  Irma in the first place.  If it is in fact being produced by secret military technology at the hands of international terrorists, we need to  know.  These terrorists might be Americans, Israelis, Saudis, Germans, Russians..lurking behind professional or official sounding  government agencies or corporate names.  If such secret weather changing technology is in effect, by not disclosing the story behind  Irma, the press is part of the treachery.   Most people see the disasters as natural or due to climate change.   See: Marketwatch: Richard Branson takes shot at man made climate change in Irmas wake. By Tomi Kilgore (09/11/2017) http://www.marketwatch.com/story/richard-branson-takes-shot-at-man-made-climate-change-in-irmas-wake-2017-09- 11  ‘Man-made climate change is contributing to increasingly strong hurricanes causing unprecedented damage. The whole world  should be scrambling to get on top of the climate change issue before it is too late for this generation, let alone the  generations to come.’  Richard Branson  http://www.marketwatch.com/story/richard-branson-takes-shot-at- man-made-climate-change-in-irmas-wake-2017-09-11   In that case, it is a global problem, so global citizens will have to work together across national boundaries.   Some of the answers  might be coming from non-Americans - even people being designated as the enemy (like certain Islamic groups).  It is hard to take  Islamic groups seriously if their whole approach seems to be anti-Jewish beyond any sense of reason.  Yet if Israel is in fact doing  something, we need to know about it.  In order to take Islamic groups seriously, we need verifiable evidence - not just fanciful  sounding stories filled with fanatical anti-Semitism.  Islam must take its first steps by weeding out its own biases.   See:  https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/new-black-panther-party Excerpt:  The New Black Panther Party is a virulently racist and anti-Semitic organization whose leaders have encouraged  violence against whites, Jews and law enforcement officers. https://www.splcenter.org/fighting- hate/extremist-files/group/new-black-panther-party Sometimes people want to believe something so badly they color reality with false ideas and misguided ideals.  Then the ego gets  involved and admitting one is wrong becomes harder the more one has invested in the wrong idea.  Growing up as children hearing  the stories about Jews, an Islamic person might be so entrenched with that vision of Jews he or she cannot let go; new ideas won’t  come in.  When a group feels people don’t like them or respect their religious views, they might to great extremes to cover up the  truth and misappropriate evidence to make the other guy look bad.  I feel Israel might have sold its soul to obtain Israel after WWII  and even as a young person never really felt good about the state of Israel, although I commiserated with the plight of Jews during  the Holocaust.  On the other hand, although Israel’s take-over and stance in the Middle East is not substantiated by innate right or moral virtue, I still don’t think Islam needs to beat up on the world over it.  I feel Islam’s response has been obsessive and often immoral in using non-stop guerrilla warfare against innocent people who were not doing anything wrong other than gong about their  lives on planes, trains, bridges and in public places or buildings.  To blow someone up or torture them to death because you are angry  over Palestine or historical land grabs by a current country is despicable.  Holding decades or even centuries old grudges to justify  beheading people makes no sense.   How do we get to the core of the main players, no matter who they are?  I suspect some of them are in fact American, unfortunately,  but I don’t feel they are the only ones.  How open are we to getting past our resentments and biases to find the real culprits?  The  main culprits are probably more about attitudes.  The disposition for greed and short-sightedness are the terrorists:   Live today, gone tomorrow.   It doesn’t matter if I blow up the entire planet, I have a billion dollars in my pocket.  It doesn’t matter if create a million drug addicts or infect a million people with diseases, I’ve got my end covered.   It’s the predicted end of the world: it is God’s will on earth to kill off all the sinners - let’s help it along People with these mindsets are the real enemy, no matter their skin color, religion or place of national origin
NOTES / 2017-9 On 9/11
System Abuse System Abuse
Far Zone Far Zone
About About